Просмотреть запись

SETTING THE STAGE: ENEOLITHIC AND BRONZE AGE LITHIC INDUSTRY MARKERS IN THE MOUNTAIN-FOREST TRANS-URALS

Электронный научный архив УРФУ

Информация об архиве | Просмотр оригинала
 
 
Поле Значение
 
Заглавие SETTING THE STAGE: ENEOLITHIC AND BRONZE AGE LITHIC INDUSTRY MARKERS IN THE MOUNTAIN-FOREST TRANS-URALS
 
Автор Usacheva, I. V.
Spiridonov, I. A.
Korochkova, O. N.
 
Тематика ARCHAEOLOGY
ARROWHEADS
MORPHOLOGY
RAW MATERIAL
STONE INDUSTRY
TECHNOLOGY
TYPOLOGY
URALS
 
Описание The authors propose to discuss the methodology of searching for the definitive indicators of flaking techniques of the Eneolithic — Bronze Age in the mountain-forest Trans-Urals. The methodology is based on a step-by-step cross-referencing analysis of raw materials, technological and morphological characteristics of stone artifacts. The multilayer settlement Shaitanskoe 4–6 stone tools assemblage (the Kirovgrad district, Sverdlovsk Oblast) served as the main resource for the analysis. Main stages of the site’s populating correlated with the Eneolithic and the Bronze Age (Cherkaskul culture). Arrowheads were chosen as the key category of artifacts. This choice was based on both the large number of these artifacts (more than 100 items) and their fairly reliable cultural and chronological verification by the well-known interments and single-layer sites of the Urals and the adjacent territories. The Eneolithic flaking technique demonstrated a pronounced variability of tools. Pressure flaking technique used for obtaining blanks of a certain type (blades, microblades, and flakes of preset shapes and sizes) formed the lithic industry basis. During the Bronze Age, the emphasis shifted towards biface-production-oriented striking and counter striking knapping techniques. One of the Bronze Age lithic industry markers was a significant amount of characteristic waste, defected and good blanks as opposed to a small group of two-sided retouched tools with a high level of standardization and manufacturing quality (arrowheads, knives of an asymmetrical triangular shape with an arc-shaped side blade, scrapers of geometric shapes, etc.). The Eneolithic population preferred siliceous and clay shales, high-quality homogeneous jaspers, some types of chalcedony of gray and yellow, homogeneous flint of greenish and greenish-gray shades, and rhyolites of similar colors. During the Bronze Age, most popular materials were mottled flint of mediocre quality, siliceous shales of dark shades, siliceous quartz and chalcedony of light tones, and some varieties of jasper. © 2023 Institute of History and Archeology of the Ural Branch of RAS. All rights reserved.
Russian Science Foundation, RSF: 22-28-00066
techniques. One of the Bronze Age lithic industry markers was a significant amount of characteristic waste, defected and good blanks as opposed to a small group of two-sided retouched tools with a high level of standardization and manufacturing quality (arrowheads, knives of an asymmetrical triangular shape with an arc-shaped side blade, scrapers of geometric shapes, etc.). The Eneolithic population preferred siliceous and clay shales, high-quality homogeneous jaspers, some types of chalcedony of gray and yellow, homogeneous flint of greenish and greenish-gray shades, and rhyolites of similar colors. During the Bronze Age, most popular materials were mottled flint of mediocre quality, siliceous shales of dark shades, siliceous quartz and chalcedony of light tones, and some varieties of jasper. The study was supported by the Russian Science Foundation, Project No. 22-28-00066.
 
Дата 2024-04-05T16:28:32Z
2024-04-05T16:28:32Z
2023
 
Тип Article
Journal article (info:eu-repo/semantics/article)
|info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
 
Идентификатор Усачева, ИВ, Спиридонов, ИА & Корочкова, ОН 2023, 'К ПОСТАНОВКЕ ПРОБЛЕМЫ МАРКЕРОВ КАМЕННЫХ ИНДУСТРИЙ ЭПОХИ ЭНЕОЛИТА И БРОНЗЫ ГОРНО-ЛЕСНОГО ЗАУРАЛЬЯ', Уральский исторический вестник, № 2 (79), стр. 116-126. https://doi.org/10.30759/1728-9718-2023-2(79)-116-126
Усачева, И. В., Спиридонов, И. А., & Корочкова, О. Н. (2023). К ПОСТАНОВКЕ ПРОБЛЕМЫ МАРКЕРОВ КАМЕННЫХ ИНДУСТРИЙ ЭПОХИ ЭНЕОЛИТА И БРОНЗЫ ГОРНО-ЛЕСНОГО ЗАУРАЛЬЯ. Уральский исторический вестник, (2 (79)), 116-126. https://doi.org/10.30759/1728-9718-2023-2(79)-116-126
1728-9718
Final
All Open Access, Bronze
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85165481040&doi=10.30759%2f1728-9718-2023-2%2879%29-116-126&partnerID=40&md5=24e7fa9404af322abaee05cf516bb480
http://uralhist.uran.ru/en/pdf/Usacheva_et_al_UIV_2023_2.pdf
http://elar.urfu.ru/handle/10995/130660
53958046
10.30759/1728-9718-2023-2(79)-116-126
85165481040
 
Язык ru
 
Связанные ресурсы info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/RSF//22-28-00066
 
Права Open access (info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess)
 
Формат application/pdf
 
Издатель Institute of History and Archeology of the Ural Branch of RAS
 
Источник Ural Historical Journal
Ural'skij Istoriceskij Vestnik