Complementary or adverse? Comparing development results of official funding from China and traditional donors in Africa
Электронный научный архив УРФУ
Информация об архиве | Просмотр оригинала| Поле | Значение | |
| Заглавие |
Complementary or adverse? Comparing development results of official funding from China and traditional donors in Africa
|
|
| Автор |
Marson, M.
Savin, I. |
|
| Тематика |
DEVELOPMENT
DEVELOPMENT EFFECTIVENESS FOREIGN AID HARMONISATION OWNERSHIP AFRICA CHINA COMPARATIVE STUDY DEVELOPMENT AID INTERNATIONAL AID OWNERSHIP |
|
| Описание |
While China has become an important source of aid and other official funding for Africa, its coordination with other development partners remains limited, and its contribution to development has been questioned. Despite different development models represented by China and traditional donors, recent studies demonstrated that funding from the two has similar determinants, but little was done to systematically compare their role for development. The paper evaluate their impacts on infrastructure, governance, external debt sustainability and dependence on natural resources. Furthermore, we explore whether there are (dis)advantages from the presence of both donors. Overall, we find that China has similar, beneficial, impact when compared with traditional donors on all the development dimensions but debt. The presence of both donors, in turn, has a positive effect on debt sustainability, but negative impacts on the other dimensions. We interpret these results based on effective development cooperation principles of ownership, alignment, harmonisation, and accountability. © 2022
Università degli Studi dell'Insubria Russian Science Foundation, RSF, (19-18-00262) M.M. acknowledges support from the University of Insubria. I.S. acknowledges financial support from the Russian Science Foundation [RSF grant number 19-18-00262 ]. Funding sources had no involvement in study design in the collection, analysis and interpretation of data in the writing of the report and in the decision to submit the article for publication. |
|
| Дата |
2024-04-08T11:07:38Z
2024-04-08T11:07:38Z 2022 |
|
| Тип |
Article
Journal article (info:eu-repo/semantics/article) info:eu-repo/semantics/submittedVersion |
|
| Идентификатор |
Marson, M & Savin, I 2022, 'Complementary or adverse? Comparing development results of official funding from China and traditional donors in Africa', Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Том. 62, стр. 189-206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2022.04.010
Marson, M., & Savin, I. (2022). Complementary or adverse? Comparing development results of official funding from China and traditional donors in Africa. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 62, 189-206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2022.04.010 0954-349X Final All Open Access; Green Open Access https://re.public.polimi.it/bitstream/11311/1233244/2/STRECO-S-21-00190%20%283%29.pdf https://re.public.polimi.it/bitstream/11311/1233244/2/STRECO-S-21-00190%20%283%29.pdf http://elar.urfu.ru/handle/10995/131492 10.1016/j.strueco.2022.04.010 85129334584 000816967200014 |
|
| Язык |
en
|
|
| Связанные ресурсы |
info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/RSF//19-18-00262
|
|
| Права |
Open access (info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess)
|
|
| Формат |
application/pdf
|
|
| Издатель |
Elsevier B.V.
|
|
| Источник |
Structural Change and Economic Dynamics
Structural Change and Economic Dynamics |
|